Meat Promotion Wales
Sad passing of David Filmer
ECC Profiles - Stefan Yerby
Matthew Elmes
animal
Kirsty Richards
Animal Microbiome
FAO Soil Erosion Report
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - Micro-anaerobic solutions for small livestock farmers
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - Biomethane solutions for nutrient management
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - A policy-based view on the role of livestock in nature-friendly food production
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - The multidimensional role of livestock in supporting ecosystem services and biodiversity
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - Fabulous fibre returning value to the UK wool market
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - The role of livestock in a circular economy
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - The role of animal by-products in the bio-based industries and circular economy
Alberto Palmonari
glasportbio
BiOrbic
Dairy-Tech 2025
Midlands Integrative Biosciences Training Partnership (MIBTP) PhD opportunities
Ethics & Scientific Publishing
Climate-Friendly Beef: Long-Term Assessment of Methane Inhibitors PhD Opportunity
AI-based discovery of methane mitigation additives for ruminants
The Emerging Global Crisis of Land Use - Report
The Emerging Global Crisis of Land Use - Report Summary
Dairy Calf-to-Beef Conference Proeedings 2024
BSAS News December 2024
BSAS Operations and Administrative Executive
SMT
BGS
Sponsors and Exhibitors
Holly Vickery
Ridhdhi Rathore
SEFARI
Assesssing potential risk factors for microbiological contamination in raw meat-based diets for UK pet dogs
BSAS 2021 - One Health (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - One World One Animal Science Session 1
BSAS 2021 - One World One Animal Science Session 2 (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - One World One Animal Science Session 3
BSAS 2021 - Q&A Session One World One Animal Science (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Q&A Session The Importance of International Collaboration (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Impact of Next Generation Computation to Inform Scientific Discovery Session 1 (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Impact of Next Generation Computation to Inform Scientific Discovery Session 2
BSAS 2021 - Impact of Next Generation Computation to Inform Scientific Discovery Session 3 (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Q&A Session Impact of Next Generation Computation to Inform Scientific Discovery
BSAS 2021 - Collaboration Education and Training in a Virtual World Session 1
BSAS 2021 - Collaboration Education and Training in a Virtual World Session 2 (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Q&A Session Collaboration Education and Training in a Virtual World (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - One Health Keynote Session (CPD value = 4 points)
BSAS 2021 - One Health Q & A (CPD value = 1 point)
Q & A Session - animal ‘Family’ Launch
BSAS 2021 - Hammond Lecture (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Poultry Production (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Environmental Impact of Ruminants Session 1 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Environmental Impact of Ruminants Session 2 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Small Ruminants Health and Welfare Session 1 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Small Ruminants Health and Welfare Session 2 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Towards the Green Deal Session 1 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Towards the Green Deal Session 2 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Young Stock (CPD value = 4 points)
BSAS 2021 - Poultry Health (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Dairy Genomics and Genetics (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Dairy Health and Welfare Session 1 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Dairy Health and Welfare Session 2 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Dairy Production (CPD value = 4 points)
BSAS 2021 - Equine Health Husbandry and Performance (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Equine Reproduction (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Pig Session 1 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Pig Session 2 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Sheep Session 1 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Sheep Session 2 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Beef Cattle Session 1 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Beef Cattle Session 2 (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Beef Cattle Session 3 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Intake Models for Growing Cattle (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Verbal Communication and Public Engagement Skills Workshop (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2021 - Writing a Scientific Paper (CPD value = 4 points)
BSAS 2021 - Writing for the Web and Lay Audiences (CPD value = 4 points)
BSAS 2021 - Animal Perspectives Workshop (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Industry Prize (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Developing Talent - Modelling (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Developing Talent - Animal Nutrition Energy and Metabolics (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Developing Talent - Animal Nutrition Supplementation (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2021 - Developing Talent - Animal Disease (CPD value = 1 point)
BSAS 2021 - Developing Talent - Animal Production and Welfare (CPD value = 2 points)
ECC Profiles - Georgina Smith
BSAS 2022 - Derwent Gordon Memorial Lecture (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2022 - Precision Livestock Farming and Modelling (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2022 - Ruminant Production (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2022 - Ruminant Feed and Nutrition (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2022 - Poultry Session 1 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2022 - Poultry Session 2 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2022 - Beef Session 1 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2022 - Beef Session 2 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2022 - Pig Session 1 (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2022 - Pig Session 2 (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2022 - Non Ruminant Production (CPD value - 1 point)
BSAS 2022 - Dairy Health (CPD value = 2 points)
BSAS 2022 - Young Stock (CPD value = 3 points)
BSAS 2022 - Industry Prize (CPD value = 2 points)
Meat Promotion Wales
Sad passing of David Filmer
We are sad to share the news that, after a brief illness, David Filmer passed away peacefully on 6th December 2024. He is much missed by family, friends and colleagues.
There will be a Service for the Celebration of his life on 22nd January, 2pm at St Michael's Church, Brent Knoll.
For any further information, please contact Bob Filmer, his son at bob@flockman.com.
ECC Profiles - Stefan Yerby
Matthew Elmes
animal
Kirsty Richards
Animal Microbiome
FAO Soil Erosion Report
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - Micro-anaerobic solutions for small livestock farmers
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - Biomethane solutions for nutrient management
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - A policy-based view on the role of livestock in nature-friendly food production
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - The multidimensional role of livestock in supporting ecosystem services and biodiversity
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - Fabulous fibre returning value to the UK wool market
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - The role of livestock in a circular economy
Livestock Beyond Food 2024 - The role of animal by-products in the bio-based industries and circular economy
Alberto Palmonari
glasportbio
BiOrbic
Dairy-Tech 2025
About Dairy-Tech
Following the tremendous success of Dairy-Tech 2024, we are thrilled to unveil that Dairy-Tech 2025 is scheduled for Wednesday, 5th February 2025 at Stoneleigh Park.
It will continue to showcase ground-breaking technology, be the platform for new product launches – introducing the latest innovation and services and deliver a wide variety of speaker sessions addressing the key topics affecting the industry.
If you would like to enquire about a stand at Dairy-Tech 2025 please contact
Morgan Pearce on 02476 217383 or email morganpearce@rabdf.co.uk
The event will continue to be aimed at progressive dairy professionals regardless of their herd size or system type, reflecting the transformation of the sector over recent years, where it has been recognised that farmers must be competitive and able to match both their size and system to their available resources and milk contract.
Regardless of their cost base, future successful dairy businesses must be informed, resilient, proactive and efficient; Dairy-Tech provides this platform, alongside a recognition that dairy farming has become a professional industry.
Dairy-Tech will allow visitors to gain maximum exposure to new and exciting industry innovations relevant to their business, despite a large variation in cost base and system.
Please check the exhibitor list to see which companies will be joining us.
Midlands Integrative Biosciences Training Partnership (MIBTP) PhD opportunities
There are currently a number of exciting funded PhD opportunities at Harper Adams University and we have EIGHT within the Animal Behaviour and Welfare Research group. A full list of these opportunities can be found here: https://www.harper-adams.ac.uk/research/598/possible-funded-mibtp-projects.
Closing date for applications is January 2025 and project start dates are October 2025. More information about the partnership (including submission deadlines) can be found here: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mibtp/
The projects!
Further details on our eight exciting research projects are detailed below. The lead supervisors are the first ones listed – if you would like any information about these projects then please contact the lead supervisor, including the PhD title in your enquiry. The blog will be updated with live links to the MIBTP page as and when projects are added to there so keep checking back for those!
Individuality in animals: applying personality profiles to evidence-based management of small mammals in education
Supervisors: Dr Ellen Williams, Dr Holly Vickery
Live animals, particularly small mammals, are routinely used to teach practical skills in educational institutions, which puts thousands of animals at risk of reduced welfare if the impact of these experiences is not understood. Some small mammals in education show behavioural changes between weekdays and weekends, and individual differentiation in behaviour and ability to learn tasks. Personalities influence how individuals perceive, react to, and interact with their environment, conspecifics and threats. The importance of incorporating animal personality into evidence-based management of zoo animals has been highlighted. Determining whether certain personality types are predisposed to positive or negative responses to unfamiliar people has ramifications for animals and should be considered in management. Within the educational setting, there is no reliable or validated way of measuring individuality in small mammals. There is an urgent need to incorporate individual differences into evidence-based management of small mammals in education and to validate methods for collecting such data.
Project objectives
- Create a validated method for capturing personality for small mammals in education
- Monitor stability of small mammal personality over time in relation to the academic calendar (e.g. term time, out of term time)
- Quantify the impacts of personality on health and experiences for small animals in education
- Design evidence-based protocols for assessing and using personality in small animal management in education
More information is available here.
Investigating the long-term impacts of environmental enrichment for dairy heifers, and its relation to a successful transition into the milking herds
Supervisors: Dr Holly Vickery, Dr Gemma Charlton
Most UK dairy cattle are kept indoors for some, or all, of the year and it is accepted that this restricts behavioural expression, despite this, environmental enrichment (EE) use is limited. Effective EE decreases abnormal behaviour, and increases appropriate species-specific behaviours (e.g. exploration, foraging, play, social interaction). Brushes are routinely used in the milking herd as effective EE, and there is research regarding the provision of EE for calves pre-weaning, however whilst heifers likely experience the same benefits, the most feasible and efficacious EE for this age group is under explored. Increasing the complexity of the rearing environment promotes behavioural and social flexibility, which can help individuals better cope with stressors. This seems highly relevant for heifers as they must cope with transitioning into the milking herd and the suite of stressors related to this (changes in their physiology, social and physical environment). However, the stage between weaning and when a heifer joins the milking herd is a neglected research area, and it seems likely they are typically not provided with EE. Evidence demonstrates that there is individual variation in an animal’s ability to adapt to environmental changes, and farm animal personality is an important research area, as personality and coping style are likely related. Understanding personality and how it relates to the efficacy and use of EE, and coping ability around times of transition is highly relevant to improving future heifer rearing.
This project will focus on EE provisions during the heifer rearing stage, and the student will have access to Harper Adams University’s ‘Future Farm’ herd of dairy cattle, and to laboratories to undertake analysis of physiological indicators. The overall aim is to understand the long-term individual heifer impacts of enrichment provision in relation to their personality, and improving their health, welfare and productivity when experiencing the transition to the milking herd.
Project objectives
- Understand preference and use of a range of EE
- Investigate the interaction between heifer personality and the efficacy of enrichment, by utilising personality testing techniques.
- Quantify the long-term impacts of enrichment, by investigating if enriched heifers transition more successfully into the milking herd, and investigate if there is a relationship between personality and coping ability.
More information is available here.
The importance and welfare implications of pasture access for lactating dairy cattle
Supervisors: Dr Gemma Charlton and Dr Emma Bleach
Discussions around mega dairies and zero-grazed dairy cattle are topical and highly debated. In the UK, the majority of dairy cattle are housed indoors for at least part of the year, with many farmers moving to year-round housing. Research from Harper Adams University (HAU) was some of the first, internationally to investigate the preference of dairy cows for indoor cubicle housing or pasture. The results of these studies show that dairy cows prefer to spend their time outside during the night, however, overall preference of dairy cattle for pasture is complex and there is little research on which aspects of pasture are most valued by dairy cattle, and how much time dairy cattle require at pasture, to meet their needs and improve their health and welfare, compared to zero grazed systems, without compromising production. Such research could enhance our comprehension of the importance of pasture access. Moreover, it could help us to further understand the needs of dairy cattle and inform future dairy cow housing.
Aims: The aims of the study are to understand the importance of pasture access for lactating dairy cows and to develop practical strategies to allow dairy cows access to pasture in conditions which improve their welfare compared to zero grazed cattle, whilst also maintaining milk production.
Objectives:
- To establish whether dairy cattle prefer an indoor open lying area or pasture
- To investigate whether dairy cows are motivated to access pasture when they have access to an open indoor lying area, through varying walking distance between indoor housing and pasture.
- To explore a range of grazing strategies which are practical for farmers and improve welfare, compared to zero grazed cows, whilst maintaining production.
More information is available here.
Optimising management strategies within dairy cow-calf contact systems in the United Kingdom
Supervisors: Dr Annabelle Beaver & Dr Emma Bleach
This project aims to investigate and optimise cow-calf contact (CCC) systems in dairy farming, addressing a growing interest from both consumers and farmers in the UK and globally. While separating dairy calves from dams within 24 hours is standard practice, CCC systems are gaining attention due to potential benefits for cow and calf health, welfare, and social sustainability. Dairy producers already implementing CCC cite reduced workload as a key advantage, while conventional dairy farmers tend to view CCC systems as infeasible. Thus, lack of knowledge and guidance on optimal management practices may represent a barrier to more widespread uptake of CCC. The proposed research for the PhD studentship will comprise two main components:
- Identification of optimal management practices for CCC systems in the UK, involving both cross-sectional and longitudinal data collection. Management decisions will be analysed for associations with welfare and performance indicators for cows and their calves.
- A prospective cohort study on postpartum disease and fertility outcomes for the dam to address key research gaps regarding the effects of CCC on dam health.
By combining on-farm data collection and epidemiological analysis, the project aims to provide evidence-based guidance for optimal CCC management practices, potentially facilitating wider adoption in the dairy industry.
More information is available here.
Beyond vertebrates: developing validated welfare standards and ethical guidelines for invertebrate management in captivity, farming and research
Supervisors: Dr Heather Campbell & Dr Ellen Williams
Animal welfare has traditionally focused on vertebrates, but recent studies and societal shifts have prompted increased interest in the welfare of invertebrates. Invertebrates, such as insects, arachnids, and molluscs, are increasingly used in a variety of contexts: as companion animals, in zoos, in outreach and educational settings, and in research. There has also been a boom in the prevalence of farmed insects for human consumption, alongside breeding them as live animal feed. There is a paucity of scientific data on the welfare needs of invertebrates and their capacity for suffering or sentience remains limited. The range of settings in which invertebrates are kept, the numbers of invertebrates kept and few regulations in their care leave invertebrates exposed to the potential for poor welfare experiences. Particularly with the growth of insect farming for food and feed, it is crucial to understand and improve their welfare. This project will establish baseline data on the current handling, management, and welfare conditions of invertebrates in a range of contexts and develop best practice guidelines informed by empirical evidence. The research will bridge the gap between current practices and the emerging understanding of invertebrate welfare, ultimately contributing to more ethical and scientifically grounded management of these animals.
Objectives
- Survey of Current Practices including current handling, management, housing and welfare conditions
- Behavioural Studies on Invertebrate Sentience
- Development of Best Practice Guidelines for the care and management of invertebrates across different contexts.
- Develop an ethical framework for invertebrate welfare, considering their use as food, in research, and as companion or display animals, and the implications of invertebrate sentience.
The project will use a combination of surveys, stakeholder interviews, and literature reviews to assess current invertebrate welfare practices and identify knowledge gaps. Laboratory-based behavioural experiments will be conducted to study indicators of stress, cognition and behavioural indicators of animal emotions, while ethical considerations will be evaluated using established frameworks, refined through collaboration with ethicists and welfare scientists.
More information is available here.
A non-invasive method to monitor status of Johne's disease in dairy cattle
Supervisors: Dr Tharangani Herath, Dr. Karim Farag and Dr. Gemma Charlton
In the UK, JD was ranked as the top cattle disease affecting national production efficiency in a survey conducted in 2021. There is no permanent cure or designated treatment for the disease. Currently, JD is managed by regularly screening and removing chronically infected animals. Timely and accurate detection of JD, especially in during the early sub-clinical infection is therefore crucial for disease management and prevention of the spread. Although various diagnostic methods such as ELISA, culture, PCR, and histopathology are available, the accuracy and sensitivity of those methods are limited, especially in the early stages of infection, due to the transient nature of the disease and pathogen shedding. Hence, this PhD proposal aims to explore an early detection method by integrating Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) analysis with behavioural indicators from affected cows. We utilise existing diagnostic techniques to validate this innovative approach, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy as a non-invasive method for identifying JD.
To develop and validate a novel VOC and biomarker-based tool for monitoring Johne's disease (JD) on farms, we will undertake several key objective;
- We will collect diagnostic samples, including faeces and blood, along with VOC samples from both JD-affected and healthy animals on a dairy farm known for endemic JD. Additionally, we will collect tissue samples (e.g., ileum and mesenteric lymph nodes) from animals culled due to JD for histopathological analysis.
- We will characterise the VOCs present in these samples using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) while performing routine diagnostic assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and histopathology to assess the animals' infection status.
- We will integrate the diagnostic data, VOC profiles, and histopathological findings to design a monitoring tool specifically for JD detection, exploring appropriate statistics to observe the differences in the data to identify key predictive factors associated with the disease.
- Finally, we will conduct an assessment to evaluate the tool's feasibility for use on affected farms, ensuring that it meets practical needs for effective JD monitoring in real-world agricultural settings.
More information is available here.
Improving the welfare of farmed fish by personality and physiological profiling in aquaculture settings
Supervisors: Dr Tharangani Herath & Dr Ellen Williams
Millions of fish are reared in aquaculture settings as part of farming food for human consumption. While stocking fish at high densities can increase their commercial potential, it can also expose fish to environmental stressors that may negatively impact their health and welfare, in addition to exposing fish to poor water quality, pathogens or injury. These stressors can detrimentally affect fish, influencing their health, welfare and behaviour, decreasing their production performances and market value and causing negative welfare experiences. There is a significant gap in knowledge regarding farmed fish, because most research has been carried out in controlled laboratory conditions. The aim of this project is to develop a reliable toolset to measure and monitor welfare indicators in farmed fish at the production level. This project will utilise personality profiles, immune and stress biomarkers and the microbiome to identify non-invasive parameters that can be used in welfare assessment.
More information about this multi-disciplinary project can be found here: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mibtp/phd/supervisors/therath/
Improving welfare of salmonids: Impact of stress on behaviour and host-pathogen dynamics during early life stages
Supervisors: Dr Tharangani Herath, Dr Robert Mukiibi, Dr Ellen Williams
Early life stages (ELs) of salmonids are critical to the success of commercial production, as they significantly influence the overall health and development of the fish. In salmonids, this period comprised of several key developmental phases, including fertilisation, embryonic development, and larval stages, each of which is essential for proper growth and survival. During these stages, farmed fish are often subjected to overcrowding, exhaustive handling, and social stressors. In addition, environmental factors, such as poor water quality and temperature fluctuations, exacerbate stress levels. The stress in young fish not only weakens their immunity but also increases their susceptibility to diseases, leading to significant mortality rates. Reports indicate that around 38% of fish mortalities occur during the hatchery phase, with approximately 70% attributed to infectious diseases (e.g. Yersinia ruckeri and Flavobacterium psychrophilum). Addressing early life stressors is essential for improving the health, welfare, and productivity of salmonids in aquaculture settings; however, current research on this topic is limited.
The aim of this study is to enhance the welfare of salmonids by investigating the effects of stress on behaviour and host-pathogen dynamics ELs. Personality assessments will be undertaken to understand how individual traits influence group behavioural differences, particularly during first feeding and fry stages. In conjunction with personality testing, we will develop a set of welfare metrics (WM), which will include physiological stress indicators such as cortisol levels, haematological and immune parameters.
More information about this project can be found here: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/mibtp/phd/supervisors/therath/
Ethics & Scientific Publishing
In academia and research, publishing peer reviewed articles is often seen as a key driver for scientific progress and, lets be honest, career development (and, in my own career too, often job security). Publication enables the dissemination of knowledge, often fosters collaboration and drives innovation. However, scientific publishing is facing growing scrutiny over ethical challenges that threaten the integrity, accessibility and fairness of the process. From issues surrounding authorship and peer review to the rise of ‘predatory’ journals, the ethical landscape of scientific publishing demands urgent attention.
The pressure to "publish or perish" in academia exacerbates these ethical problems and often there is a perception that quantity outweighs quality in terms of publications. Indeed, publication rates have grown exponentially over recent years. In a recent paper ‘The strain on scientific publishing’ the authors reported a 47% increase in the number of peer-reviewed journals in 2022 compared with 2016. This number far outstripping an increase in scientists over this same period seems unsustainable, but the publication numbers keep rising. Therefore, it seems unsurprising that people are feeling the pressure to maintain their outputs.
Mostly, the publication rates are down to the drive and determination of individuals and groups of scientists working to deliver often mind-boggling levels of data. However, just a quick look at a site, such as retraction watch and it seems that, for some, the pressure to publish high quality ‘research’ leads to scientific misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication and falsification.
We rely, in the main, on the peer review process to ensure the quality and veracity of publications. While it is often considered the gold standard for ensuring the quality of scientific publications, it’s not without its flaws. These issues have been exacerbated by the sheer volume of articles potential reviewers are asked to review. From my own experience, it is not unusual to get requests in the double figures week after week and I regularly hear stories of editors requesting fifty or more academics to review a single paper!
Therefore, it seems a gift if we as editors are provided with a list of recommended reviewers for an article that accept the invitation to review a manuscript. But is it always? A recent article in Science highlights a hitherto hidden problem: A scientist’s name had been used by others to produce a number of fake peer reviews for a single publication. How was this done? Quite easily, the email address provided for the researcher named in the recommendation was fake. From this single case, 22 papers have already been retracted. It appears that this is now an increasing problem and one that editors and publishers are becoming more aware of.
But we must ask ourselves, how did we get here and where does this end? It could be argued there have always been a few people who want to cheat the system and this is a minority. However, is the current publication model really sustainable? Looking at it and the feedback I get from those involved, much of it is cracking under the unrelenting strain. Could it be that the system really could do with a reboot? As an editor, a reviewer and a published scientist, I don’t have the answers, perhaps I’m too close and wedded to the existing system but change needs to happen.
By Nick Wheelhouse, Ediburgh Napier University
Climate-Friendly Beef: Long-Term Assessment of Methane Inhibitors PhD Opportunity
Lead supervisor: Dr Katerina Theodoridou, School of Biological Science, Queen's University Belfast
Email: k.theodoridou@qub.ac.uk
Co-supervisors: Professor Sokratis Stergiadis, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Reading, Dr Omar Carballo, AFBI, and Professor Sharon Huws, School of Biological Science, Queen’s University Belfast.
Project Description: Livestock contributes 30% of methane released into the atmosphere, more than any other single zsource. The UK Committee on Climate Change (2020) has recommended a 64% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, as necessary, to meet the 2050 targets. At the same time, the Food and Agriculture Organisation has projected that the demand for red meat will continue to increase at the rate of ~1.5% per year to meet a growing population and rising living standards in developing countries. Methane-suppressing feed products commercially available (e.g., 3NOP, nitrate additives) are key policies for achieving full UK decarbonization by 2050, as outlined in the Carbon Budget Delivery Plan.
However, their long-term effect on animal performance; ruminal microbiome; and carcass quality is not known and at the same time needs to be adopted as technologies to reduce farm-gate emissions by kg of beef. This project aims to address these gaps of knowledge in growing and finalizing beef cattle. This project targets the entire life cycle of beef cattle, from the last third of gestation in the dam to birth and the finishing period, aiming to improve environmental sustainability in beef and dairy-origin beef production by reducing emissions. The key research question is: what are the effects of long-
term MSA, alone or combined, to dairy-origin beef cattle on performance, methane emissions, rumen microbiome, and carcass quality? The project will utilise in vitro screening to select the most potent inhibitors and their combinations for animal trials and generate prediction models to quantify methane emissions in beef production systems in a whole production cycle.
Research objectives and methods:
(1) Continuous gastrointestinal tract model: In vitro screening to select the best commercial MSA and their combinations (supplementary effect) at different dietary conditions.
(2) Long-term study in animals: Evaluate the long-term impacts of MSA on dairy-origin beef animals using the selected feed additives and/or their combinations (in vitro study 1).
3) Modelling to quantify methane emissions. a) Develop prediction models to quantify methane emission factors in beef and dairy-origin beef production systems in a whole production cycle. b) Modelling to quantify reduction rates in methane emissions in beef and dairy-origin beef cattle fed MSA in a whole production cycle.
AI-based discovery of methane mitigation additives for ruminants
Lead supervisor: Professor Sokratis Stergiadis, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Reading
Email: s.stergiadis@reading.ac.uk
Co-supervisors: Dr Katerina Theodoridou, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast; Dr Mauricio Cafiero, Department of Chemistry, University of Reading
Project description: Methane emissions from ruminants, such as cattle and sheep, are a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for approximately 44% of human-made methane. These emissions not only impact the environment but also represent an energy loss in livestock production. This project tackles this urgent issue by developing innovative solutions to reduce methane emissions, contributing directly to global climate goals such as the Global Methane Pledge and the UK’s Net Zero Strategy.
The focus of the project is on discovering natural compounds that can inhibit a key enzyme, methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR), which is essential for methane production in the rumen. To achieve this, the research will employ advanced artificial intelligence (AI) tools to screen thousands of compounds for their potential to reduce methane production. These tools include molecular docking, machine learning, and molecular dynamics simulations, which will predict how well different compounds interact with the enzyme.
Promising compounds will undergo further testing in laboratory models that simulate the rumen environment, such as the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC), which mimics the fermentation processes within the rumen over an extended period. These tests will measure not only methane reduction but also impacts on fermentation efficiency and microbial communities, ensuring that selected compounds are effective and sustainable. The top-performing compounds will then be tested in animal trials with cattle, where methane emissions, feed efficiency, and animal health will be rigorously observed using state-of-the-art animal monitoring technologies.
This research represents a fusion of advanced AI techniques and applied agricultural science, offering a transformative approach to reducing agricultural emissions. The use of natural compounds ensures alignment with consumer and industry demands for sustainable and safe interventions. Furthermore, the outcomes of this project have the potential to deliver significant environmental benefits while maintaining or even enhancing livestock productivity. By advancing our understanding of methane mitigation and developing innovative feed additives, this project addresses one of the most pressing challenges in sustainable agriculture and offers a unique opportunity to contribute to impactful, solution-driven research with tangible benefits for the environment, industry, and society.
Training opportunities: The project offers multidisciplinary training, including technical and transferable skills essential for a successful research career. At the University of Reading, the student will gain expertise in AI-based molecular docking, quantum mechanical calculations, and machine learning models to identify methane inhibitors. Training will include the Rumen Simulation Technique for methane reduction analysis and gas chromatography methods for evaluating fermentation parameters. An 18-month placement at the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute will provide hands-on experience in animal trials with beef cattle, including assessments of methane emissions, feed intake, growth and animal health. At Queen’s University Belfast, the student will develop skills in microbiome analysis and metagenomics to study shifts in rumen microbial populations during methane mitigation trials. Data analysis training will include linear mixed models and multivariate redundancy analysis. The student will also benefit from the University of Reading’s Graduate School workshops on research skills, scientific writing, and personal development.
Project supervision style: The student will be supported by a lead supervisor, two co-supervisors representing different disciplines, and an industry CASE partner supervisor. Weekly 1:1 meetings with the lead supervisor will monitor progress and address challenges. Monthly meetings with the full supervisory team, including the CASE partner, will ensure academic and industry alignment. During the student’s 18-month industry placement, bi-weekly virtual check-ins with the lead supervisor will maintain academic support, while weekly meetings with the industry supervisor will provide
guidance in the industrial setting. Additionally, the student will spend a few weeks training with the co-supervisor, receiving specialised guidance and participating in virtual meetings for ongoing support. Feedback on written work will be provided within two weeks, and for urgent deliverables, within one week. This structure ensures continuous communication, even during remote periods, and fosters interdisciplinary and applied learning.
Student profile: Applicants should hold at least an upper second-class degree in a relevant scientific discipline, such as animal science, biology, biochemistry, computational sciences, or related fields. A foundational understanding of animal metabolism, physiology, microbiology, organic chemistry or molecular structures is important for engaging with the project’s focus on methane mitigation in ruminants. Familiarity with computational tools (e.g., Python, R) and basic data analysis skills is beneficial, but not essential, as comprehensive training in AI-based molecular docking, machine learning
models, and advanced statistical methods will be provided. Similarly, prior experience with laboratory techniques, such as fermentation models (e.g., RUSITEC), gas chromatography, microbiome analysis, or animal trials, is advantageous but not required, as the student will receive hands-on training in these areas.
Candidates should demonstrate a willingness to develop both computational and biological research skills, as the project integrates innovative AI techniques with applied agricultural science.
Stipend (Salary): FoodBioSystems DTP students receive an annual tax free stipend (salary) that is paid in instalments throughout the year. For 2024/25 this is £19,237 (£21,237 at Brunel University) and it will increase slightly each year at rate set by UKRI.
Equity Diversity and Inclusion: The FoodBioSystems DTP is committed to equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI), to building a doctoral researcher(DR) and staff body that reflects the diversity of society, and to encourage applications from under-represented and disadvantaged groups. Our actions to promote diversity and inclusion are detailed on the FoodBioSystems DTP website and include:
• Offering reasonable adjustments at interview for shortlisted candidates who have disclosed a disability or specific learning difference.
• Guaranteed interview and applicant mentoring schemes for applicants, with UK home fees status, from eligible under-represented ethnic groups.
The Emerging Global Crisis of Land Use - Report
The Emerging Global Crisis of Land Use - Report Summary
Dairy Calf-to-Beef Conference Proeedings 2024
BSAS News December 2024
BSAS Operations and Administrative Executive
The British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), is looking to recruit an Operations and Administrative Executive to manage our membership and Register services.
BSAS established in 1944, is a charity dedicated to supporting animal science in the UK and Ireland. BSAS has an interest in science related to all animals with the Society’s core focus being livestock. We communicate, influence, and engage interest in how sustainable livestock production systems can contribute to socio-economic and ecosystem outcomes.
Our diverse membership comprises all career stages and includes leading academics, government, and industry professionals in all areas of animal science and related areas. This creates a dynamic and dedicated community committed to the betterment of the sector.
BSAS collaborative global networks aim to address climate change, global food security and one health challenges. BSAS provides an active platform that enables the dissemination of evidence-based research findings to show the role of livestock and other domesticated animals in high welfare and holistic sustainable agri-food systems.
The role, key requirements
- Administration of BSAS Membership and Register process and services
- Management of member communications
- Maintenance and updating of content on Society’s website
- Co-ordination of Awards applications and processes
- Maintenance and updating of the BSAS Policy and Procedure Manual
- Organisation of informational and learning webinars
Additional tasks
- Maintenance of central e-filing system, confidential and shared files
- Maintenance of the Society's mailing lists
- Assisting and supporting CEO as required
- Managing meeting invitations
- Attendance and taking minutes at board meetings
- Attend BSAS conferences
Person specification
Key Knowledge and Skills
Essential
- Highly organized and proactive with the ability to handle a busy cross-functional workload
- Excellent time management and planning skills with great attention to detail
- Excellent interpersonal skills with the ability to build successful relationships at all levels inside and outside the organisation
- Excellent MS Office skills and experience using Zoom and Microsoft Teams
- Knowledge of working with content management systems, maintaining and updating website content
Desirable
- Experience of working in an environment that operates internationally, being able to communicate with people across language, culture and time zones, additional language skills
How to apply
If this sounds like the role for you, please send your CV (maximum 2 x A4) and a supporting statement (max 2 x A4) to bsas@bsas.org.uk
Your supporting statement is a very important part of your application and is vital for us to decide whether to shortlist you for an interview. Please demonstrate how you meet the criteria listed in the person specification and your motivation to work for BSAS, detailing your experience, skills, achievements and/or abilities that are relevant for the role.
Please note you must have existing Right to work in the UK as BSAS is not a sponsoring organisation.
30 hours/week, homebased. Annual Salary £20,000 (dependent on experience)
SMT
BGS
Sponsors and Exhibitors
Holly Vickery
Ridhdhi Rathore
SEFARI
Assesssing potential risk factors for microbiological contamination in raw meat-based diets for UK pet dogs
'Assesssing potential risk factors for microbiological contamination in raw meat-based diets for UK pet dogs: a reflection on owner storage practices and meat source' by Caitlin Marie Smithers, University of Chester.
Summarised by Katie Dubarry, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Edinburgh
Raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) have gained in popularity among pet owners in recent years, but they come with microbiological risks that have the potential to affect both animal and human health. There is a lack of clear advice on RMBD storage for food safety, and other work has shown that some owners will refrigerate raw meat ‘leftovers’ for subsequent meals. This dissertation aimed to assess potential risk factors in RMBDs intended for pet dog consumption, by focusing on differing storage practices and their effects on meat from different commercially-available sources.
The research sourced beef and chicken RMBDs from 4 different UK companies. Total bacterial counts were measured at 3 time points: freshly thawed, after 24 hours of refrigeration, and after 48 hours of refrigeration. Samples were also cultured using selective media agar plates to allow the identification of bacterial species Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae.
The study found that total bacterial counts increased significantly in the beef samples that had been refrigerated for 48 hours. However, there was not a significant increase after 24 hours. In the chicken samples no significant increase in bacterial counts was observed across the time points. However, the chicken samples had a higher baseline level of bacterial counts than the beef samples.
Bacterial cultures showed that many samples contained potentially harmful bacteria. 50% of samples contained E. coli, 37% contained Salmonella spp., 87.5% contained Shigella spp., and all samples contained Pseudomonas spp.
These findings have important implications for pet owners. The study highlights that storing thawed RMBDs in a refrigerator may not be safe, with highly pathogenic bacteria present in both beef and chicken products. The high bacterial counts, particularly in chicken, suggest that there is a risk of gastrointestinal illness due to the feeding and storage of RMBD. As storage may take place in the same refrigerator as food for human consumption cross-contamination is possible, placing a risk not only on pets but also to owners themselves.
This work represents an important piece of research in an unexplored area. This approach could be expanded in the future to increase sample size, sample type, and different storage facilities. If raw meat-based diets continue to increase in popularity it will become increasingly important to produce clear and uniform guidelines to prevent animal and human disease.